Comparison between a 6‑lead smartphone ECG and 12‑lead ECG in athletes.
Full text not available from this repository.| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Status: | Published |
| Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.008 |
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Electrocardiology |
| Volume: | 66 |
| Page Range: | pp. 95-97 |
| Date: | June 2021 |
| Divisions: | Molecular Cardiology |
| Depositing User: | General Admin |
| Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.03.008 |
| ISSN: | 00220736 |
| Date Deposited: | 10 Oct 2021 09:09 |
| Abstract: | Athletes sometimes experience transient arrhythmias during intense exercise, which may be difficult to capture with traditional Holter monitors. New and highly portable technology, such as smartphone electrocardiogram (ECG) devices, may be useful in documenting and contribute to diagnosis of exercise-induced arrhythmias. There are little data available regarding the new Kardia 6 lead device (6L) and no data regarding its use in athletic populations. In this short communication, we present pilot data from 30 healthy athletes who underwent a 12‑lead ECG and subsequent 6L reading. Our pilot data show relatively high levels of agreement for QTc and PR interval and QRS duration, with the 6L readings slightly but significantly shorter on average. Keywords: Arrhythmia; Athlete; Electrocardiogram; eCardiology. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Creators: | Creators Email Orchard, Jessica J. UNSPECIFIED Orchard, John W. UNSPECIFIED Raju, Hariharan UNSPECIFIED La Gerche, Andre UNSPECIFIED Puranik, Rajesh UNSPECIFIED Semsarian, Chris UNSPECIFIED |
| Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2021 09:09 |
| URI: | https://eprints.centenary.org.au/id/eprint/1126 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
